Tuesday, May 6, 2008

9/11/01 + 5

opener.jpg

I feel reticent and unqualified to make any sort of original commentary on 9/11. I don't think it's hyperbole to say that we're still shocked -- and American policy, bombings and the sheer confusion as to how we should proceed since that day have proved a suitable reverberation. Here's the best of what I've read today, the most memorable out of a amorphous mass of tributes, mentions, delirium:

  • German Joys points us to this piece from Prospect Magazine about the possible causes of 9/11. Exhaustive, but conclusive -- Bergen sees bin Laden overextending himself and his organization, but still undercutting the ten-plane attack suggested by Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, in an attempt to get the U.S. to scale back from the Middle East. While making a convincing reality within which the attacks were possible, Bergen also vents America's latest noxious emission: conspiracy thories implicating Jews, Saudis, and the U.S. government itself. Try watching Loose Change without wishing the government would silence Dylan Avery, even if it would lend his blathering credence.

  • McSweeneys re-ups a beautiful speech delivered by writer John Hodgman two weeks after 9/11. He contextualizes 9/11 in the terms of storytelling, illustrating one way to comprehend it: by compacting it to sanity through words, "which for us reduces to manageable entities all the passions that would otherwise madden and destroy us" -- er, that's Gene Wolfe, one of my own favorite storytellers. If you know a better, more universal method, I'm all ears.

  • Finally, this piece from the Boston Globe (via Dialog International) explains how 9/11 was the end of American civilization, and this without resorting to bathos or superlatives. The final cries, calls and messages that remain from that day all attest to a truth beyond the nihilism. What is it Severian says in The Claw Of The Conciliator? "In the final reckoning there is only love, only that divinity." Or, alternately, the regret that it could never be fully expressed.

4

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.anglofritz.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/1539

Comments

Some choice 911 selections there, mate. As an American, I find myself at a loss for words this time of year and prefer to read the writings of others. As for Loose Change, that movie is clearly not helping anyone but Mr. Avery himself.

http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=911_morons

a very sad day, and....ditto to Kirk's comment....you make me proud.......

Try watching Loose Change without wishing the government would silence Dylan Avery, even if it would lend his blathering credence.

I am not sure what you mean. Please elaborate.

"Egyptian leader Hosni Mubarak was prescient when he warned in 2003 that the Iraq war would spawn "100 new Bin Ladens."" (from that Prospect Magazine piece)

The fervour with which this reasoning is widely dismissed by people seeking to justify the Iraq invasion is both staggering and terrifying. While the belief that "the policy of inaction is not something we can substantially subscribe to" (Tony Blair, February 2003) still dominates the landscape, it remains unfathomed what good the war has brought to those who initiated it.

As per the link Kirk cited: if Dylan Avery was right on every count (or even a few) and the government was keeping a monolithic, interlocking conspiracy under the lid, why haven't they snuffed out Avery, "made it look like an accident," so it wouldn't be brought to light?

Post a comment

(If you leave a comment here, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)